Rigged Picture

11 Aug 2010 (Wed) at 2:04 pm 7 comments

Conrado de Quiros: Small Picture

Conrado de Quiros' small picture.

Big Picture
Conrado de Quiros
Philippine Daily Inquirer

Conrado de Quiros, in the context of the Aquino presidency, is a weird thing. He cannot conceal that he’s a total Noynoy supporter, but still he attempts to distance himself from the Aquinos, striking a “critical” pose in order to retain his fiery reputation and journalistic integrity.

In his August 11, 2010 column “Big Picture,” de Quiros takes on the Hacienda Luisita issue, writing about the new stock-or-land proposal from the Luisita management and the flak it received. His column’s basic outline goes:

  • Leftists lack credibility.
  • Hacienda Luisita is an embarrassment to the Aquinos.
  • People Power was pure and beautiful, and the Left had nothing to do with it.
  • Luisita’s stock disctribution option is questionable.
  • Cory and Noynoy are symbols, and Luisita is a symbolic fight.
  • The Aquinos’ redistribution of Luisita is long overdue.
  • Land reform must be considered alongside “globalization”
  • Farming as a profession is untenable, so farmers should just take the stock.

A careful reading of this column will show that beyond the turbulent rhetoric and seemingly persuasive language, Conrado de Quiros is a fencesitter who’s fallen into Aquino property.

That he refers to leftists as “the people who cry about Hacienda Luisita being the mother of all injustices” only confirms one thing: the Left has been and still is the foremost critic of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) and Luisita, and is the major ideological force, no matter how de Quiros and other apologists dismiss it, in the struggle for genuine agrarian reform and societal change.

Given the strength and validity of the leftist analysis, it is no wonder that De Quiros acknowledges and appropriates the arguments of the Left. However, he chooses to simultaneously (and viciously) dismiss leftists. He argues that leftists have no credibility to rail against Luisita given that they ran alongside tycoon Manny Villar in the recent elections, but at the same time employs the Left’s general position that “Hacienda Luisita is a black mark on the face of the Aquinos,” that Cory should’ve had no qualms about redistributing it during her term.

De Quiros, however, maneuvers this position in favor of the Aquinos:

Land to the tiller was a rallying cry of freedom. And People Power gathered no small amount of following also because it offered land ownership that differed from the sham that was Marcos’ and the one that came without a deed from NPA appropriation. (italics mine)

De Quiros skillfully phrases his arguments in such a way that a very leftist call, “land to the tiller,” is separated from the Left. He instead links it to People Power (ergo, the Aquinos), and manages to disparage the NPA while he’s at it. (EDSA 1, as we are all aware, is being copyrighted by the current administration as a purely Aquino creation—notwithstanding the fact that the Manila-centered People Power was largely a product of the Left’s tireless and genuinely revolutionary struggle under the Marcos dictatorship, predated by the First Quarter Storm in Manila and a systematic, countryside-based organizing effort in the rest of the nation.)

De Quiros then berates Cory Aquino for not living up to her promise of comprehensive agrarian reform, and acknowledges the failure—but not the injustice—of the Cojuangcos’ stock distribution option. But de Quiros doesn’t dwell on that, since doing so would generally promote the leftist position. Instead, he moves the discussion into the “symbolic” realm, giving him the convenient freedom to discuss Cory, Noynoy and Luisita independent of reality.

He urges Noynoy to abide by his mother’s CARP and distribute the Luisita land, not because it is the right thing to do, but to avoid its becoming “a huge blot on the Aquino name, an albatross on P-Noy’s government dogging like a bad omen any effort at reform it undertakes.” In short, de Quiros argues from the Aquino point of view: land distribution not as justice, but political damage control. Saving face becomes the primary objective, and not justice and livelihood for farmers.

De Quiros then moves on to more fencesitting:

Merely distributing the land, as his detractors demand, does not necessarily guarantee good results, or even social justice. In the first place that is not what all, or probably most, of the tenants want, and it is just as tyrannical to dictate upon them that they do as it is to deny it to those that do.

He agrees with the leftists’ (aka “detractors”) analysis that genuine agrarian reform does not end with land distribution. He then calls leftists “tyrannical” for convincing farmers that justice involves giving “land to the tillers”—a phrase which de Quiros ironically used earlier in favor of People Power and the Aquinos. He continues:

Many prefer the security of a steady income, however paltry, to the risks of owning land. “Land is life” is a nice slogan for those who have not actually buckled down to the tedious, backbreaking and often counterproductive work of tilling it.

“The risks of owning land,” he calls it, as if big landowners like the Cojuangcos, Ayalas, Aranetas and Lopezes are actually in a precarious state. He also mentions “a steady income, however paltry”—a nice-sounding phrase, until you become very specific: a daily take-home pay of Php 9.50. The choice for farmers, then, is Php 9.50 per day or land. Of course, de Quiros manages to inject a potshot at the leftists who argue that “land is life.” What he is describing though—someone who has “not actually buckled down to the tedious, backbreaking and often counterproductive work of tilling land”—sounds like no one else but himself, the Manila-based columnist. The composition of the Left, on the other hand, includes not just activists organizing in the countryside, but also real farmers who, unlike de Quiros, actually till the land of wealthy landowners like Aquino. Indeed, peasants comprise the bulk of the extrajudicial killings under Arroyo, among them the martyrs of Luisita.

Towards the end, de Quiros makes his most illuminating arguments. Land reform, he says, must be considered alongside globalization. The failure of CARP before, “the record of CARP reversions, or of beneficiaries almost immediately selling off their lands to buyers,” is not government’s fault—notwithstanding the well-documented systematic watering-down of CARP. “There are limits to what government can do,” he says, “particularly given the storm of open markets.”

Open markets. The government is powerless against neoliberalism, or so de Quiros wants us to believe. Let’s see what the President, Noynoy Aquino himself, has to say. In his first State of the Nation Address, Noynoy proudly declares his antidote to poverty: “Ito ang magiging solusyon: mga Public-Private Partnerships.” Aquino lauds what is basically neoliberalism, resolving to pursue the free-market agenda because, in his honest opinion, “masasabi kong maganda ang magiging bunga ng maraming usapin ukol dito.”

There’s the rub.

“No one wants to farm anymore,” de Quiros says. He even cites the rice crisis a few years ago, a crisis which stemmed not from poor production, but from a shrewd cartel of businessmen trying to jack up the price of the most basic of needs.

In a backward agricultural country like ours, majority of the land is agricultural, its population dominated not by city-based writers but peasants who live off the land, working to feed not just their families but the rest of the nation as well. “Why would you want to remain a farmer?” de Quiros asks. “Or your children to be so?”

Farmers work hard, persisting even in the most dire circumstances. Unlike people like de Quiros who see professions in agriculture as “an option” which needs to be made attractive, most of us see agriculture as a need. The Philippines cannot do without agriculture. The object of land reform is not to make farming “a reasonable option,” but to make it a strong national industry, to ensure that the nation is well-fed, consumers and farmers alike. And ending “grapes-of-wrath type misery” is the government’s responsibility.

To be a farmer is to make a commitment to the land, and to the people who live off it. Farming is about nature, growth, nourishment and sustainability. To be a farmer, one must possess discipline, strength, and integrity.

Better a farmer than a Palace apologist. #


Entry filed under: Edgar Allan Paule, Writings. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

A Dream Goes On Forever History in a Hurry

7 Comments Add your own

  • 1. krguda  |  11 Aug 2010 (Wed) at 3:47 pm

    Compare this with what De Quiros wrote six years ago:

    “Noynoy Aquino says leftists goaded the workers in Hacienda Luisita, who have been complaining about their lot, to strike. Well, so what? At the very least, try goading workers who have no deep-seated grievance to strike and see how far you’ll get-these days, particularly, when work is harder to come by than honesty in GMA’s government. May be leftists goaded the workers in Hacienda Luisita to strike-I can believe it-but they could not have succeeded if the workers were not ripe for the goading.”

    “You can’t have a more oligarchic rule than feudal rule, which takes place in Hacienda Luisita notwithstanding its seemingly capitalist conversion into an industrial enclave. All the conversion shows is that, as in the days of the feudal manor, serfs are owned by their landlords body and soul. They can be told to do anything, including to agree to “stock option.” Their well-being is a matter of manorial beneficence. They have no more power to determine the future of Hacienda Luisita, or their share of its profits, than beggars have the power to determine the amount of alms they can get from prospective donors.”


  • 2. Sine Sigwa « Kapirasong Kritika  |  11 Aug 2010 (Wed) at 9:35 pm

    […] isang magandang sulatin ni Edgar Allan Paule tungkol sa kolum ni Conrado de Quiros hinggil sa Hacienda Luisita! Kumusta naman si Cris Pablo […]

  • 3. Teo  |  11 Aug 2010 (Wed) at 9:40 pm

    Kahit noong eleksyon, ang sabi ng Kaliwa, pare-pareho lang ang mga kandidato. May nakipagkasundo lang sa Kaliwa sa plataporma at mayroong umiwas nang todo.

    HIndi pa ba pinapatunayan ng mga hakbangin ni Noynoy na totoo nga?

  • 4. screamingtuod  |  11 Aug 2010 (Wed) at 10:16 pm

    halu-halong ideya mula sa isang pluralistang komentarista. mula sa people power less the people (na walang iniambag ang kaliwa at pawang mga dilaw na sundalo lamang ang nagyaya ng mga tao na bumaha sa edsa, yaong mga nandidiri sa mga urban poor, pawisang manggagawa at magsasaka at iba pang mahihirap na sektor) hanggang sa rice crisis. pilit na umaagos sa papalaking suporta sa panawagang ipamahagi na ang hacienda luisita sa mga magsasaka nang may pagligtas sa animo’y mga santa at santo na sina cory, ninoy at noynoy aquino. may pagkritisa sa carp na pawang mga katoto naman niya ang sumuporta sa pagpalawig nito sa carper. binanggit ang panawagang lupa sa nagbubungkal ngunit ang pamamahagi ay hindi nangangahulugang hustisyang panlipunan. kita raw ang mas gusto ng nakararaming manggagawang bukid, maganda sana kung anong channel ng mga kontroladong media ito napanood o narinig. inaalala rin ang krisis sa bigas samantalang bunga rin ito ng malawakang land use conversion tulad ng luisita mall, luisita industrial park na ginagawa tulad ng mga cojuangco-aquino at kauri ni noynoy aquino. biglang binanggit ang globalisasyon samantalang kontra ito sa tunay na reporma sa lupa dahil ipinatupad na dati pa ng gubyerno ang market-oriented land reform at hindi epektibo. ang daming komento ukol sa kung sariling sasakahin ng magsasaka ang lupa samantalang walang pagkondena sa pakinabang ng mga cojuangco-aquino sa sdo at carp. halu-halong kalamay na paksa na malinaw na kinuha lang sa mga sekondaryong pagkukunan tulad ng tv, dyaryo, internet at iba pa, sa madaling salita, hindi siya lumabas sa kanyang opisina upang tanungin man lang ang mga manggagawang bukid na matagal nang pinagsasamantalahan ng angkan ni cory, ninoy at noynoy.

  • 5. alab himagsik  |  12 Aug 2010 (Thu) at 4:36 am

    mahusay ang analysis at paglalapat ng mga counter-arguments. ang tindi lang talaga ni de Quiros. Kung may respeto’t dangal pa s’ya sa sarili, 2 pagpipilian lamang: una: i-denounce na n’ya ang pagpapakatuta sa rehimeng Aquino at maging obhektibo sa kanyang kolum at iba pang pagsusulat; ikalawa: tumigil na s’yang magsulat at magbigti.

  • […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vencer Crisostomo, Tine Sabillo. Tine Sabillo said: Rigged Picture (Conrado De Quiros the former fencesitter and now Palace apologist) by blogger Edgar Allan Paule http://ow.ly/2op0M […]

  • 7. coco martin heidegger  |  19 Aug 2010 (Thu) at 10:18 am

    i think the shade of yellow should be brighter next time edgar. http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/nation/view/20100819-287599/De-Quiros-named-SSS-president

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Viewer Discretion is Ours

This is a blog focusing on (but certainly not limited to) Philippine cinema and visual culture. Spoilers are to be expected in the reviews. That's pretty much it.

Discrétions Archivées

View Us Elsewhere

Viewer Discretion is a proud contributor to Sinewaya

Viewer Discretion is a proud contributor to Sinewaya, a film blog from the Philippines featuring critical essays on film, media and society.

Yup, View Us Elsewhere

Edgar Allan Paule is a proud spinner on Hang the DJ

Edgar Allan Paule is also a contributor to Hang the DJ, a Filipino music blog for music lovers and by music lovers.

Ask me a question!

I'm on http://www.formspring.me/edgarallanpaule. Interrogate me, dude.

Viewer’s Viewers

Facebook Discretion

Edgar Allan Paule

Create Your Badge

I'm online once in a while, and I need new friends! Add me up! :-)

Enter your email address to subscribe to Viewer Discretion and receive notifications of new posts by email.

%d bloggers like this: